Grief: Conservationists Cry Foul As Court Dustbins Their Case, Okays Demolition Of Bugoma Forest

Grief: Conservationists Cry Foul As Court Dustbins Their Case, Okays Demolition Of Bugoma Forest

Accessdome.com: an accessible web community

By Spy Uganda

Kampala: Conservationists in Uganda have condemned as “shallow and absurd” a court ruling that authorized the government to allow swathes of a tropical forest to be cleared for a sugar-cane plantation.

READ ALSO: “Save Bugoma Forest” Activists Run To EU Over Govt’s Aid On Vanishing Natural Resources

Three environmental groups had taken the government to court over a decision to allow Hoima Sugar Ltd to build on 5,500 hectares (13,500 acres) in the Bugoma Forest Reserve.

It is said that alongside sugar, the firm plans to build schools, a market and a hospital, as well as develop an ecotourism centre.

The Water & Environment Media Network, the National Association of Professional Environmentalists and the Africa Institute for Energy Governance (AFIEGO) filed a lawsuit against the government’s environmental agency, the National Environment Management Authority (Nema), and the company in September.

READ ALSO: Here Is Why Museveni, Kings Oyo & Gafabusa Shouldn’t Keep Silent On Perishing Bugoma Forest

The contested land was leased to Hoima Sugar in 2016 by Solomon Iguru Gafabusa, king of the ancient kingdom of Bunyoro-Kitara, who said the land was ancestral and not part of the protected forest.

Last week, Justice Musa Ssekaana, head of the high court civil division, threw out the case. He said it was based on unsubstantiated allegations to win public sympathy and mislead the court.

“It appears the applications in this matter were premised on distorted facts and the applicants have attempted to suppress the real facts in order to make a ‘flowery’ case in court by exaggerating that the entire forest is being cleared for sugar-cane planting,” said Ssekaana in his ruling.

READ ALSO: Bugoma Forest Saga: Gov’t Dragged To EAC Court Over Negligence Of Natural Resources

Dickens Kamugisha, chief executive of AFIEGO, said: “The whole ruling is very shallow and absurd. The judge completely failed to appreciate the legal questions relating to the issues to be determined.”

Robert Akugizibwe, secretary of the Association for the Conservation of Bugoma Forest, said: “We express our dissatisfaction that once again a court of law is wasting an opportunity to clear the ground on the shameful matters related to the destruction of Bugoma forest.”

The reserve, 155 miles (250km) north-west of the capital, Kampala, covers more than 40,000 hectares (100,000 acres). It is the largest remaining block of natural tropical forest along the Albertine rift valley and was due to be designated a national park.

READ ALSO: Bugoma Forest Saga: Activists Turn Guns Against Hoima Sugar Ltd, Mobilizes Ugandans To Boycott Its Products To Save ‘Perishing’ Forest

Campaigners said the reserve plays an enormous role in preserving wildlife migration corridors. They plan to appeal against the decision.

The forest is home to more than 34 species of mammals, including nine on the International Union for Conservation of Nature’s Red List of Threatened Species, including grey-cheeked mangabeys and 600 chimpanzees. There are 255 species of birds and 260 species of trees.

Accessdome.com: an accessible web community

Accessdome.com: an accessible web community

Related Post

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

//graizoah.com/afu.php?zoneid=3565727
%d bloggers like this: