By Spy Uganda
In a dramatic political summersault that has left even their most ardent supporters flabbergasted, the self-styled “principled” National Unity Platform (NUP) has shamelessly reneged on its long-held boycott of the Inter-Party Organisation for Dialogue (IPOD), opting instead to join the same table it once condemned as a den of regime puppets. 
A leaked letter dated October 7th, 2025, and signed by NUP’s Secretary General David Lewis Rubongoya, confirms the party’s willingness to “sign the MOU” and participate in the National Consultative Forum’s applicable organ under IPOD—pending a Constitutional Court decision. The missive, addressed to the IPOD Secretariat in Ntinda, effectively admits that NUP has caved to the very framework it previously dismissed as a façade for political bribery and co-optation.
For years, NUP—under Robert Kyagulanyi Ssentamu, alias Bobi Wine—has loudly proclaimed that it would never join IPOD, accusing it of being a State House-sponsored trap meant to silence dissent through monetary handouts masquerading as dialogue funds. Yet, like a hungry hyena returning to its leftovers, the party has now eaten its own vomit, choosing to dance to the same tune it once cursed.
Political observers interpret this volte-face as a betrayal of principle and a capitulation to financial temptation, given that IPOD membership grants parties access to public funding under the amended Political Parties and Organisations Act (2005). The law now compels all registered parties to belong either to IPOD (for those represented in Parliament) or to the Forum for Non-Represented Political Parties—effectively making participation a gateway to political financing.
In the letter, Rubongoya admits that while NUP is “currently challenging the amendment before the Constitutional Court,” the party “is cognizant that it is the current and binding law.” That statement alone reeks of political hypocrisy from a party that has built its brand on resistance, defiance, and moral superiority.
Critics say the move exposes NUP’s real appetite for cash rather than conviction. “It’s not about dialogue, it’s about money. They’ve realized that principles don’t pay bills,” quipped a political analyst who preferred anonymity.
As Ugandans digest this political about-face, one thing remains clear: the self-declared vanguard of the people’s struggle has succumbed to the same gravy train it once condemned, proving yet again that in Uganda’s political theatre, there are no permanent enemies—only permanent interests.
