Since You Were Sleeping, You Can Change Gear By Snoring: Bobi Wine Dustbins URA’s Revaluation Process For His Armored Monster

Since You Were Sleeping, You Can Change Gear By Snoring: Bobi Wine Dustbins URA’s Revaluation Process For His Armored Monster

Accessdome.com: an accessible web community

By Spy Uganda

Kampala: The Uganda Revenue Authority has received another big blow from National Unity Platform President, Robert Kyagulanyi Ssentamu aka Bobi Wine who has since snubbed their letter that required him to hand back his armoured monster ride for re-examination and re-evaluation citing it was allegedly under-declared.

READ ALSO: URA Makes U Turn On Bobi Wine: “We Were Asleep When We Under Valued Your Armored Car,Bring It Back!”

URA’s letter seen by TheSpy Uganda revealed that the officials didn’t know it was an ‘armoured vehicle’ and therefore it was under-declared and undertaxed.

However, in a response letter from Bobi’s lawyers of Wameli and Co. Advocates, to URA, Bobi maintains that the tax collectors who seemed to be asleep when they were clearing his vehicle, don’t have automatic powers to re-examine his vehicle once it left their premises, hence asking them to withdraw their decision because it is not backed by any law.

READ ALSO: Differentiate Between Armored & Bullet Proof Car: Frank Gashumba Lectures Ugandans About Bobi Wine’s Vehicle

Kyagulanyi’s Letter To URA Through His Lawyers

“Much as it is true you have the powers under section 236 (d) of the EAC customs management Act to “examine” goods, you do not have automatic powers to “re-examine” goods which were in your custody (warehouse), were examined, assessed to tax, the tax fully paid and the goods released to the owner/Taxpayer,” Kyagulanyi’s letter reads.

READ ALSO: Here Are Rear Features About Bobi’s Armored Car That Shocked Security, Detects Landmine 10kms Away

The lawyers add that the decision to recall their client’s motor vehicle is not only arbitrary and without legal basis but it is also a threat to their client’s right to property and privacy, among others.

They further responded to URA thus; “Your decision to recall our client’s motor vehicle is not only arbitrary and without legal basis but it is also a threat to our client’s right to property and privacy, among others.”

READ ALSO: Declare It Or Lose It To Government: IGG Threatens Bobi Wine Over Acquisition Of Armored Vehicle

As a result, therefore, the lawyers asked URA to immediately withdraw their decision to recall their client’s motor vehicle as long as such a decision is arbitrary and unsupported by any law.

Accessdome.com: an accessible web community

Accessdome.com: an accessible web community

Related Post

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

//graizoah.com/afu.php?zoneid=3565727
%d bloggers like this: